Sometimes the characteristics of a particular patient can be used to more accurately predict that patient's eventual outcome. death, chance of recovery, recurrence) and the frequency with which these outcomes can be expected to occur. It refers to the possible outcomes of a disease (e.g. The prognosis is a prediction of the course of a disease following its onset. Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia: The STARDdem Initiative.We are currently in the process of updating this chapter and we appreciate your patience whilst this is being completed.Reporting guidance for violence risk assessment predictive validity studies: the RAGEE Statement.RiGoR: reporting guidelines to address common sources of bias in risk model development.An extension of STARD statements for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies on liver fibrosis tests: the Liver -FibroSTARD standards.Consensus guidelines on plasma cell myeloma minimal residual disease analysis and reporting.SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee.Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST).REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).Guidelines for Developing and Reporting Machine Learning Predictive Models in Biomedical Research: A Multidisciplinary View.RECORDS : Improved reporting of Monte Carlo Radiation transport studies: Report of the AAPM Research Committee Task Group 268.Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement.EULAR recommendations for the reporting of ultrasound studies in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).The APOSTEL 2.0 Recommendations for Reporting Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Studies.STAndard Reporting of CAries Detection and Diagnostic Studies (STARCARDDS).Intraoperative fluorescence diagnosis in the brain: a systematic review and suggestions for future standards on reporting diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility.Standardized Reporting of Machine Learning Applications in Urology: The STREAM-URO Framework.EULAR points to consider for minimal reporting requirements in synovial tissue research in rheumatology.Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing.Evidence-based statistical analysis and methods in biomedical research (SAMBR) checklists according to design features.Recommendations for Reporting Machine Learning Analyses in Clinical Research.Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) : The TRIPOD statement. STARD-BLCM : Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models.STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts.Transparent Reporting of Multivariable Prediction Models in Journal and Conference Abstracts: TRIPOD for Abstracts.Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration.Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist.Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA).Show the most recently added records first. Key reporting guidelines, shaded green, are displayed first. Displaying 32 reporting guidelines found.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |